Brian Winum explains how familiar technical SEO checks apply to AI discovery. He covers crawler permissions, Bing index coverage, JavaScript rendering, site performance, and connected structured data, then shares three checks you can run on your own site.
Key Takeaways
Show notes
Brian Winum walks through the technical SEO checks he starts with when a site is hard for AI systems to discover or read. The familiar checklist covers crawl access, rendering, speed, and structured data. The first step is deciding which systems you want to reach and testing what each one actually receives.
Start with robots.txt and the server response. A robots rule, firewall, or CDN setting can change which crawlers reach a page. Brian recommends checking Bing index coverage alongside Google because each index gives you a separate view of discovery and eligibility.
Then compare the initial HTML with what appears after JavaScript runs. If an important service description, heading, or link only appears after a script or interaction, some fetchers may miss it. A crawlability and JavaScript guide walks through how to spot the gap.
Brian also separates the experience of loading a page from the work an automated visitor has to do. Core Web Vitals help assess aspects of the user experience. Lighthouse’s Agentic Browsing category adds checks for whether agents can understand and interact with the interface.
Once the page is reachable and readable, use consistent structured data to describe the relationships that the visible page supports. A service and the business providing it should connect through consistent identifiers across relevant pages.
Brian closes with three starting points: confirm access for the crawlers you intend to allow, put essential content in the initial HTML, and connect the entities you describe. The AI Readiness Audit can help identify which of those issues deserves attention first.
Chapters
Host
Brian Winum is a partner at MAXPlaces and MAXBURST with more than 20 years in digital marketing. On MAXVolume, he examines AI search, SEO, and what changes in online discovery mean for businesses.
About Brian Winum →Full transcript
1,238 words · Full transcript from supplied captionsTranscript provided from the episode subtitles. Select a timestamp to play from that point.
What changed in technical SEO
Technical SEO is not dead. But here's the uncomfortable truth I want to open with: if you're still doing it the way you did three years ago, you're tuning your site for a visitor who, more and more, isn't a human being. The plumbing under your website — the stuff nobody sees, the stuff that was always somebody else's problem — quietly became the whole game again. Because the thing showing up to read your site now is an AI, and it is a far less patient, far less forgiving guest than Google's crawler ever was. So today I want to take you under the hood.
I'm Brian Winum, this is MAXVolume, and today we're going under the hood on how technical SEO quietly turned into AI crawl readiness — and what actually changed down there.
The same checklist for a different reader
Here's the one-sentence version, because it reframes everything that follows. The checklist barely changed. Who it's for changed completely.
It's the same bullet points it's always been — can they crawl you, can they render you, are you fast, are you structured — except the thing on the other end reading your site is no longer a patient search engine that will wait around and forgive your mess. It's an AI fetcher on a tight budget, and if you make it work too hard, it just leaves. So let me walk the house the way one of those machines does, starting at the front door.
Check crawler access and robots.txt
Step zero is simply this: can the machines even get in? And this is where I find the most self-inflicted damage. Back when everyone panicked about AI scraping, a wave of sites dropped a line into their robots dot text file to block the AI crawlers — GPT bot, Claude bot, Perplexity bot, Google-Extended. It felt responsible at the time. What it actually did was wall the brand off from the exact systems their customers now ask for recommendations.
So the first thing I check isn't a ranking factor at all. It's literally whether, when GPT bot knocks, the door opens or stays shut. You would be amazed how many doors are locked by a single line of code nobody even remembers adding.
Why Bing index coverage matters
And it's not one door anymore. In the old world you mostly cared about one crawler — Google's. Now it's a whole crowd of them, and they don't all behave the same or get fed the same way. Here's one that surprises people: a big share of what ChatGPT and Copilot can cite comes through Microsoft's index. So your Bing coverage — the thing most marketers cheerfully ignored for a decade — is suddenly load-bearing for AI answers.
If Bing never properly indexed you, there's a whole slice of the AI world that simply cannot see you, no matter how good your content is. I've sat with businesses that were spotless in Google and effectively invisible the moment the question got routed through an assistant, and nobody on their team had ever thought to check, because for twenty years there was no reason to.
What client-side JavaScript can hide
Okay — the door's open, the crawlers can reach you. Next problem: can they actually read what's there? This is the one that trips up modern sites the most. A lot of sites today build their pages with JavaScript — the page shows up blank for half a second, then the real content paints in once the browser runs the code. To a human, that half-second is invisible; the page just works. Google's crawler learned to be patient and wait for that. A lot of the AI fetchers don't. They grab the raw HTML, and if your actual content isn't in there yet, they see an empty shell and move on.
You've got a beautiful page that, to the machine, looks like nothing at all — a gorgeous storefront with the lights off and the door photographed before anyone turned anything on. And the cruel part is you'll never see it happen, because when you load your own site it looks perfect.
Performance and Lighthouse agentic browsing
And that's the heart of the whole thing — the less forgiving guest. Google spent fifteen years getting more and more generous: rendering your JavaScript, forgiving your messes, guessing what you meant. The AI crawlers did not inherit that patience. They're operating on tight budgets — limited time, limited context, a whole internet to get through — so they reward the sites that make it easy and skip the ones that make it hard.
Which pulls speed right back into the conversation. Google even shipped a category in their Lighthouse tool for what they call agentic browsing — essentially grading how ready your site is for an AI agent to move through it. Speed and clean structure stopped being about human impatience. Now they're about machine efficiency.
Connect structured data across pages
Reachable, readable — the third piece is understandable. It's one thing for a machine to grab your text. It's another thing entirely for it to know what that text means. And that's the layer most people never built: structured data. Schema markup. It's the machine-readable labeling that says this is a service, this is the business that provides it, this is a review, here's who it belongs to. Without it, the AI is reading a wall of words and guessing at the relationships. With it, you've handed it a clean map.
And the mistake I see constantly is schema that technically exists but sits in disconnected pieces — every page declaring things in isolation, nothing linked together. The machine needs one connected picture of who you are, not a hundred loose fragments.
Think of it as the difference between handing someone a shoebox of index cards and handing them a filled-in org chart. Same facts, wildly different odds that they walk away understanding you correctly — and the AI only gets one quick pass to decide.
Prioritize the technical fundamentals
So here's the reframe I want you to leave with. Old technical SEO was about being crawlable so you could rank. The new version is about being cleanly ingestible and genuinely understandable so you can be used in an answer. Same foundation. Much higher stakes — because now there's no page two to fall back to. The machine either understands you, or it reaches for the competitor it understands better.
Now let me be honest about what this is, because there's a lot of nonsense being sold right now. None of this is exotic. There is no magic "AI-ready" tag you buy. There's no plugin that sprinkles fairy dust and makes you visible to ChatGPT.
What I'm describing is disciplined fundamentals — crawl access, clean rendering, speed, connected structure — the boring stuff a lot of sites quietly skipped for years because they could still rank without it. The AI crawlers just stopped letting you skip it. So if a vendor is selling you mystery instead of fundamentals, keep your hand on your wallet.
Three practical checks to start with
That's exactly the Technical SEO and AI Crawl Readiness work we do at MAXPlaces — going under the hood and checking what the machines actually hit when they come knocking, because most businesses have genuinely never looked. The cheapest, fastest wins are almost always the fundamentals nobody wants to hear about.
Open the door. Put your content in the HTML. Connect your structured data. Check your own door first — you would be amazed how many are locked.
I'm Brian Winum. Thanks for turning it up. I'll see you next time.




